Come on Jane, at Least Make a Show of Engaging Your Critics

Jane, I get it that you're trying to show that you're engaging with your online critics (1, 2) who have blasted your pre-capitulation stance on FISA. But if you're going to respond, don't you think it would be wise to ensure your responses aren't word-for-word identical to each other? Particularly since each writer is making a different set of points and claims?

As one of the critics that Harman responded to explains, Harman is saying something is rubbish, but she's not saying what exactly.

If Harman really wants to get credit for engaging, she'll stop the hit and run tactics, and will give a clear response.